Genius Is Not about Excelling at Something—It's about Doing Things Differently | Eric Weinstein Screenshot Download

Get Screenshots!
Genius Is Not about Excelling at Something—It's about Doing Things Differently | Eric Weinstein Images
Big Think 331,006     13,905

Download Genius Is Not about Excelling at Something—It's about Doing Things Differently | Eric Weinstein Video Thumbnails

To download for video thumbnails, right-click on the download button and save your computer or mobile device!
QualitySizeDownload
HD Quality1280x720Download
HQ Quality640x480Download
MQ Quality480x360Download
MD Quality320x180Download
SD Quality120x90Download

Genius Is Not about Excelling at Something—It's about Doing Things Differently | Eric Weinstein Images

Genius Is Not about Excelling at SomethingIt's about Doing Things Differently Eric Weinstein HD quality image
Genius Is Not about Excelling at SomethingIt's about Doing Things Differently Eric Weinstein HQ quality image
Genius Is Not about Excelling at SomethingIt's about Doing Things Differently Eric Weinstein MD quality image
Genius Is Not about Excelling at SomethingIt's about Doing Things Differently Eric Weinstein MQ quality image
Genius Is Not about Excelling at SomethingIt's about Doing Things Differently Eric Weinstein thumbnail 1
Genius Is Not about Excelling at SomethingIt's about Doing Things Differently Eric Weinstein thumbnail 2
Genius Is Not about Excelling at SomethingIt's about Doing Things Differently Eric Weinstein thumbnail 3
big think genius image BigThink.com resmi knowledge bild excellence everywhere teaching image eric weinstein big think image consensus thumbnail learning disability eric weinstein genius resmi BigThink thumbnail

Genius Is Not about Excelling at Something—It's about Doing Things Differently

Watch the newest video from Big Think: bigth.ink/NewVideo
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos: bigth.ink/Edge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We want our surgeons to be excellent. We want our classical music performers to be excellent. But do we really want excellence everywhere? This is the provocative line of thought economist and mathematician Eric Weinstein is currently chasing. We've figured out how to reliably teach excellence, which is useful — but there is a trade-off. Individuals and education institutions become hyper-focused on cutting variant individuals to a certain shape, pushing them into a mold so they can passably imitate the "excellent" population, but not really perform. "The key question is: who are these high-variance individuals? Why are our schools filled with dyslexics? Why are there so many kids diagnosed with ADHD? My claim is these are giant underserved populations who are not meant for the excellence model." To that end, Weinstein suggests that the label of 'learning disabled' is severely misguided. Perhaps we should call this phenomenon what it more accurately is: a teaching disability. How much genius is squandered by muting the strengths of these populations?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ERIC WEINSTEIN:

Eric Weinstein is an American mathematician and economist. He earned his Ph.D in mathematical physics from Harvard University in 1992, is a research fellow at the Mathematical Institute of Oxford University, and is a managing director of Thiel Capital in San Francisco. He has published works and is an expert speaker on a range of topics including economics, immigration, elite labor, mitigating financial risk and incentivizing of creative risks in the hard sciences.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT:

Eric Weinstein: I think that very few people see the words 'excellence' or 'consensus' as anything other than the most positive of words. These are the habits that most people seek to cultivate. They wish to be part of the consensus. They wish to be excellent in both their behavior and hope for excellent outcomes. I think the problem is that, we didn’t realize that excellence so far as it goes is fine but it’s involved in a trade-off. And that trade-off has to do with the fact that excellence is really about quality control. It’s about the fact that if I’m going to go for, let’s say, a classical music concert, I want to assume that the piece will be played flawlessly and I will concentrate only on the interpretive aspects of the piece above that. But, in fact, quality control can be deadly. For example, if in a jazz date where an improviser takes few risks the music may be pleasant enough as background music but it’s scarcely the sort of thing that would have animated the bebop generation who played live dates under open-mic conditions never knowing what would happen next. Perhaps the most famous jazz album of all time was Miles Davis’ 'Kind of Blue', and if you look at the sheet music for that date almost nothing was written down. It was just a question of bringing the most amazing minds together. And you can even hear a few flaws on that album which make it so exciting.

So I think that the problem is that, we have to realize that excellence is about hill climbing. It’s about the fabled 10,000 hours. It’s about practice making perfect. And this is something that, to the credit of excellence, it’s something we do know how to teach. Perhaps we don’t know how to teach everyone how to achieve it but there’s always a class of people who through dedicated repetition will be able to bring their variance under extraordinary pressure so that they are reliable members of our society. We want this in our surgeons, often. We want this in our classical music performers. But the question is: do we want it everywhere? And because we do know how to teach excellence we’ve blinded ourselves to the role that a different thought process is involved in, which I would associate with genius. The key question is: who are these high-variance individuals? Why are our schools filled with dyslexics? Why are there so many kids diagnosed with ADHD? My claim is these are giant underserved populations who are not meant for the excellence model. They are meant to be the innovators, the people who bring us new forms of music that others will seek to perfect and hone in their performance.

But these are the sorts of people who bring us new scientific vistas, who explore new terrain, and what we’ve done is we’ve created a system which effectively demonizes these different patterns. We even call these things...

Read the full transcript at bigthink.com/videos/eric-weinstein-our-cult-of-achievement-is-crushing-the-genius-out-of-people

Do you know your iq score?